intensity: affect distribution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, level
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.54
, playing
Weight: 0.52
, tempo
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect distribution 1.00
affect distribution of organisms 0.88
affect distribution of invertebrates 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(intensity, affect distribution)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect distribution of organisms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect distribution of invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(intensity, affect distribution of organisms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(intensity, affect distribution of organisms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect distribution of organisms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(intensity, affect distribution of invertebrates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect distribution of invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intensity, affect distribution of invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect distribution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(intensity, affect distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(intensity, affect distribution)