intensity: amplitude squared

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, level
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.54
, playing
Weight: 0.52
, tempo
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
amplitude squared 1.00
be related to amplitude 0.91
distance squared 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to amplitude)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(frequency, be related to amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(frequency, be related to amplitude)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(intensity, amplitude squared)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(intensity, be related to amplitude)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be related to amplitude)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(intensity, be related to amplitude)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(intensity, distance squared)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(intensity, distance squared)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(intensity, distance squared)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(intensity, be related to amplitude)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(intensity, distance squared)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intensity, amplitude squared)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intensity, amplitude squared)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intensity, amplitude squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to amplitude)