intensity: be better burning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, level
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.54
, playing
Weight: 0.52
, tempo
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better burning 1.00
burn fat 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(intensity, be better burning)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(intensity, burn fat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(intensity, burn fat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(intensity, burn fat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(intensity, burn fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be better burning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(intensity, be better burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(intensity, be better burning)