interdict: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.41
, punishment
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sanction
Weight: 0.28
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.28
, suspension
Weight: 0.27
, prosecution
Weight: 0.27
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
is effective 0.80
be effective 0.80
is more expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(punishment, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(interdict, is efficient)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(punishment, be effective)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(interdict, is efficient)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(punishment, is effective)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(interdict, is efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(punishment, is effective)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(punishment, be effective)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(punishment, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(punishment, be effective)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is more expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, is effective)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, be effective)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is effective)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(punishment, is effective)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(punishment, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(punishment, be effective)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(interdict, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(capital punishment, is effective)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is effective)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sanction, is effective)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sanction, is effective)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(imprisonment, is effective)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, is effective)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(capital punishment, be effective)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, be effective)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(capital punishment, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(interdict, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(interdict, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(punishment, is effective)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(punishment, be effective)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(punishment, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is effective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sanction, is effective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(capital punishment, be effective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(imprisonment, is effective)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(punishment, is effective)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(punishment, be effective)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(interdict, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(punishment, is more expensive)