interest rate: be low in europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, interest
Weight: 0.69
, rate
Weight: 0.68
, policy
Weight: 0.67
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.61
, zero
Weight: 0.58
, capital account
Weight: 0.36
, ratio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in europe 1.00
be negative in europe 0.89
be low in japan 0.86
be low in australia 0.84
be high in india 0.83
be low 2018 0.79
be in switzerland zero 0.78
be high in argentina 0.78
rise in canada 0.78
go up in canada 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be high in argentina)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be low in japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(inflation, be low in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inflation, be low in japan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, be high in argentina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(inflation, be high in argentina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(interest rate, be low in europe)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be negative in europe)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(interest rate, be negative in europe)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be negative in europe)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in japan)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in australia)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(interest rate, be low in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inflation, be high in argentina)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be low in japan)