interest: be higher on used cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher on used cars 1.00
be on used cars higher 1.00
be higher for used cars 0.99
be higher on cars 0.98
be on cars higher 0.98
be higher for cars 0.97
be lower on cars 0.96
be lower on new cars 0.94
be on used cars 0.92
be higher on older cars 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be higher on used cars)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be higher for used cars)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be lower on new cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(interest rate, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be higher on used cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(interest rate, be higher for used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be higher for used cars)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(interest rate, be lower on new cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be lower on new cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(interest, be higher on used cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(interest, be higher on used cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(interest rate, be higher on used cars)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(interest rate, be higher for used cars)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(interest rate, be lower on new cars)