interest: be in manley

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in manley 1.00
be in wildstar 1.00
be on tmus 0.81
be in other 0.81
be important in play 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(risk, be important in play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(interest, be in manley)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(risk, be important in play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(risk, be important in play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(risk, be important in play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(interest, be in manley)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(interest, be in manley)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(interest, be in other)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(interest, be in other)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(interest, be in other)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in other)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in manley)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(interest, be in manley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(risk, be important in play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(interest, be in manley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(risk, be important in play)