intern: be at desk drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.69
, worker
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings undergraduate
Weight: 0.33
, apprentice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk drawer 1.00
be at desk 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(intern, be at desk drawer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(worker, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intern, be at desk drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(intern, be at desk drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(intern, be at desk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(intern, be at desk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(intern, be at desk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(intern, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intern, be at desk drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(intern, be at desk drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(intern, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)