interpretation: be important part of meteorology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, regulation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings belief
Weight: 0.64
, conclusion
Weight: 0.61
, translation
Weight: 0.60
, contradiction
Weight: 0.60
, definition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of meteorology 1.00
be important in science 0.78
be important in field of science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(conclusion, be important in field of science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(conclusion, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(definition, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(conclusion, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(conclusion, be important in science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(conclusion, be important in field of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(conclusion, be important in field of science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(interpretation, be important part of meteorology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(interpretation, be important part of meteorology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conclusion, be important in field of science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(definition, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important part of meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(conclusion, be important in science)