interpretation: website

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, regulation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings belief
Weight: 0.64
, conclusion
Weight: 0.61
, translation
Weight: 0.60
, contradiction
Weight: 0.60
, definition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
website 1.00
be as important as content in website development 0.82
be as important as content itself in website development 0.81
has physical part web 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(interpretation, website)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(interpretation, website)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(interpretation, website)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concept, has physical part web)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(interpretation, website)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(interpretation, website)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(interpretation, website)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(interpretation, website)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(interpretation, website)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(interpretation, website)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)