interrupt: be necessary in time-sharing system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, signal
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.51
, event
Weight: 0.50
, exception
Weight: 0.48
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.32
, talk show
Weight: 0.32
, full stop
Weight: 0.32
, turn signal
Weight: 0.32
, do
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary in time-sharing system 1.00
be necessary in system 1.00
be used in computer system 0.81
is needed 0.79
is required 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(exception, is needed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(signal, is needed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(signal, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(exception, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(exception, is needed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(signal, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(full stop, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(exception, is needed)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(signal, is needed)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(full stop, is needed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(full stop, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in system)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(interrupt, be necessary in system)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(interrupt, be necessary in system)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in system)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(interrupt, be used in computer system)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(signal, is needed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(exception, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(full stop, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(signal, is needed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(interrupt, be necessary in time-sharing system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(exception, is needed)