interval: running burn more fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, period
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.55
, term
Weight: 0.53
, break
Weight: 0.53
Siblings third
Weight: 0.54
, unison
Weight: 0.44
, amplitude
Weight: 0.32
, minute
Weight: 0.32
, min
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
running burn more fat 1.00
running burn fat 0.99
burn more fat 0.96
burn fat 0.94
burn more calories 0.86
burn calories 0.84
running 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(interval, running burn more fat)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interval, running burn fat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(interval, burn more fat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(interval, burn more fat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(interval, running burn fat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(interval, burn more fat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(interval, running burn fat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(interval, burn fat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(interval, burn fat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(interval, burn fat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(interval, burn more calories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(interval, burn more fat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(interval, burn more calories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(interval, burn more calories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interval, burn calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(interval, burn calories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(interval, running burn fat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(interval, burn calories)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(interval, running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(interval, running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(interval, burn calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(interval, burn more calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(interval, running)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(interval, running)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(interval, burn fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(interval, running burn more fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(interval, running burn more fat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interval, running burn more fat)