intervention: be important for language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for language 1.00
affect language 0.90
be in programming language 0.85
using high level language than low level language 0.83
in languages 0.79
be important in counselling 0.78
be important in c++ 0.78
is important istqb 0.77
be more important than words 0.77
in multiple languages 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, in multiple languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, affect language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, using high level language than low level language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(action, be more important than words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, affect language)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(program, using high level language than low level language)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(action, be more important than words)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, in multiple languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(function, be important in c++)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in c++)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(program, in multiple languages)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(action, be more important than words)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect language)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(program, using high level language than low level language)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(testing, is important istqb)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, affect language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for language)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, using high level language than low level language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for language)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for language)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, in multiple languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for language)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(action, be more important than words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important for language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(testing, is important istqb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(testing, is important istqb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(intervention, be important for language)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intervention, be important for language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect language)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(program, using high level language than low level language)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(action, be more important than words)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(program, in multiple languages)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(testing, is important istqb)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect language)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(program, using high level language than low level language)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(action, be more important than words)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(program, in multiple languages)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(intervention, be important for language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)