intervention: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
be important in work 0.87
work in excel 0.80
be with team work 0.80
works 0.79
be important in social work 0.78
work in case 0.78
work together increase 0.78
need hard drive operate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(action, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, work in excel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, be with team work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(action, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(function, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(program, be with team work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(function, works)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, work in excel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(action, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(function, work in excel)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(function, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(function, works)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(program, be with team work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(screening, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, work in case)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(testing, work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(testing, works)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(action, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, work in excel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(program, be with team work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(intervention, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(testing, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(testing, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(vaccination, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(vaccination, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(screening, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(screening, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(testing, works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(testing, works)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vaccination, work in case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(vaccination, work in case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(intervention, work)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in social work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(intervention, be important in work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(intervention, be important in social work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in social work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in social work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intervention, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(action, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be with team work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(function, works)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, work in excel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(testing, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vaccination, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(screening, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(testing, works)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(vaccination, work in case)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(action, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be with team work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(function, works)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(intervention, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, work in excel)