introduction: is feminist issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings inclusion
Weight: 0.33
, concept
Weight: 0.32
, advent
Weight: 0.32
, switch
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is feminist issue 1.00
is feminist 0.95
is issue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inclusion, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inclusion, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(introduction, is feminist issue)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(introduction, is feminist)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(introduction, is feminist)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(introduction, is feminist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(introduction, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(introduction, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(introduction, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(introduction, is feminist)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(introduction, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(introduction, is feminist issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(introduction, is feminist issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(introduction, is feminist issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inclusion, is issue)