intrusion: is younger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.55
, claim
Weight: 0.51
, activity
Weight: 0.49
, issue
Weight: 0.48
, event
Weight: 0.47
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.31
, business activity
Weight: 0.30
, interference
Weight: 0.30
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.30
, seizure
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is younger 1.00
be important for older adults 0.86
work in age 0.77
work in 13th age 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(activity, be important for older adults) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(intrusion, is younger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(intrusion, is younger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(activity, be important for older adults)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(condition, work in 13th age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(condition, work in 13th age)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(activity, be important for older adults)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(activity, be important for older adults) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(intrusion, is younger)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(condition, work in 13th age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(intrusion, is younger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(intrusion, is younger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intrusion, is younger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(intrusion, is younger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(activity, be important for older adults)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(activity, be important for older adults)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(intrusion, is younger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condition, work in 13th age)