inuit: be at arctic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents eskimo
Weight: 0.45
, north america
Weight: 0.45
, thing
Weight: 0.44
, people
Weight: 0.43
, native
Weight: 0.41
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.27
, central america
Weight: 0.27
, south africa
Weight: 0.27
, think
Weight: 0.26
, remember
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at arctic 1.00
winter cold storm 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(eskimo, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inuit, be at arctic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eskimo, winter cold storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inuit, be at arctic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(eskimo, be at arctic)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(eskimo, winter cold storm)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, be at arctic)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(eskimo, winter cold storm)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(eskimo, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inuit, be at arctic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eskimo, winter cold storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inuit, be at arctic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.03
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(inuit, be at arctic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inuit, be at arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eskimo, winter cold storm)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(eskimo, be at arctic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eskimo, winter cold storm)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(inuit, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(eskimo, be at arctic)