inventor: need consider

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.62
, software
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
, scientist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings james watt
Weight: 0.64
, archimedes
Weight: 0.40
, physicist
Weight: 0.35
, philosopher
Weight: 0.34
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need consider 1.00
do 0.76
consider sustainability 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(philosopher, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(philosopher, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(inventor, need consider)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inventor, do)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inventor, consider sustainability)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inventor, consider sustainability)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inventor, do)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inventor, do)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(inventor, do)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inventor, consider sustainability)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(inventor, consider sustainability)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inventor, need consider)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inventor, need consider)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inventor, need consider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(philosopher, do)