inventory: be such difficult item manage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such difficult item manage 1.00
is difficult 0.81
CAN can called as part 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inventory, be such difficult item manage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operation, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(operation, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(inventory, be such difficult item manage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(inventory, be such difficult item manage)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(inventory, is difficult)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(inventory, is difficult)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(inventory, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be such difficult item manage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inventory, be such difficult item manage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(operation, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(inventory, be such difficult item manage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(operation, is difficult)