inventory: has trait investment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait investment 1.00
has trait waste 0.81
be asset to business 0.78
has quality asset 0.77
is current asset 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(supply, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality asset)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(inventory, has trait investment)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(inventory, has trait waste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(inventory, be asset to business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality asset)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has trait waste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(inventory, has trait waste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inventory, be asset to business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inventory, is current asset)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality asset)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, be asset to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(inventory, is current asset)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(inventory, is current asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has trait waste)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inventory, be asset to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality asset)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(inventory, is current asset)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(inventory, has trait investment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has trait investment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supply, has quality asset)