inverse: has state equation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.47
, application
Weight: 0.41
, operation
Weight: 0.41
, property
Weight: 0.35
, matrix
Weight: 0.34
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, polynomial
Weight: 0.30
, subtraction
Weight: 0.29
, recombination
Weight: 0.29
, simple function
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state equation 1.00
be important in calculus 0.77
has state fact 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(function, be important in calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inverse, has state equation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(function, be important in calculus)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in calculus)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(subtraction, has state fact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(function, be important in calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(inverse, has state equation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(subtraction, has state fact) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(subtraction, has state fact)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inverse, has state equation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has state equation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inverse, has state equation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(function, be important in calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(subtraction, has state fact)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(inverse, has state equation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(function, be important in calculus)