invitation: be at party

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.66
, item
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.60
, offer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings gift
Weight: 0.33
, handshake
Weight: 0.33
, apology
Weight: 0.32
, dinner
Weight: 0.32
, email
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at party 1.00
wants to go to party 0.90
be used to invite others to party 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at party)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gift, be at party)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(gift, be at party)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(invitation, be at party)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(invitation, wants to go to party)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(invitation, be used to invite others to party)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(invitation, be used to invite others to party)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(invitation, wants to go to party)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(invitation, wants to go to party)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(invitation, be used to invite others to party)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(invitation, wants to go to party)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(invitation, be used to invite others to party)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(invitation, be at party)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(invitation, be at party)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(invitation, be at party)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(gift, be at party)