io: be more secure than windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.56
, platform
Weight: 0.56
, operating system
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, ion
Weight: 0.53
Siblings unix
Weight: 0.32
, microsoft
Weight: 0.32
, linux
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more secure than windows 1.00
be better than windows 0.90
is more secure 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(unix, is more secure)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(unix, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(unix, be more secure than windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(linux, be better than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(unix, be better than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(unix, be better than windows)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(unix, is more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(unix, is more secure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(io, be more secure than windows)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(io, is more secure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(io, is more secure)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(io, is more secure)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(io, is more secure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(io, be better than windows)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(io, be better than windows)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(io, be better than windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(io, be better than windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(io, be more secure than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be better than windows)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be more secure than windows)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be better than windows)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(io, be more secure than windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(unix, is more secure)