io: have poorer less reviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.56
, platform
Weight: 0.56
, operating system
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, ion
Weight: 0.53
Siblings unix
Weight: 0.32
, microsoft
Weight: 0.32
, linux
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poorer less reviews 1.00
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(unix, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(linux, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(unix, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(unix, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(io, have poorer less reviews)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(io, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(io, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(io, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(io, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(io, have poorer less reviews)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, have poorer less reviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(unix, has quality better)