ipad: be better than android tablets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tablet computer
Weight: 0.72
, laptop
Weight: 0.69
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, ipod
Weight: 0.66
, tablet
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.39
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, nokia
Weight: 0.36
, thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, android
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than android tablets 1.00
be better than android tablet 0.97
be better than tablets 0.93
be better than other tablets 0.92
is tablet 0.87
is best tablet 0.87
be better than iphones 0.81
be cheaper than iphone 0.80
be called ipads 0.80
show iphone apps 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be better than tablets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(android, be better than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ipad, be better than android tablets)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ipad, be called ipads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ipad, be called ipads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ipad, be called ipads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be called ipads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laptop, be better than tablets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphones)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ipad, be better than android tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laptop, be better than tablets)