ipad: be on activation lock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tablet computer
Weight: 0.72
, laptop
Weight: 0.69
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, ipod
Weight: 0.66
, tablet
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.39
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, nokia
Weight: 0.36
, thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, android
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on activation lock 1.00
be in activation lock 1.00
ask for activation lock 0.97
ask for activation 0.90
lock 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ipad, be on activation lock)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ipad, ask for activation lock)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ipad, lock)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ipad, lock)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ipad, lock)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ipad, lock)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ipad, ask for activation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ipad, ask for activation lock)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ipad, ask for activation lock)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ipad, ask for activation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ipad, ask for activation lock)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ipad, ask for activation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, ask for activation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be on activation lock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ipad, be on activation lock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ipad, be on activation lock)