iphone: be locked to carriers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.69
, cell phone
Weight: 0.69
, samsung
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.39
, smartphone
Weight: 0.38
, ipod
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, android
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be locked to carriers 1.00
is locked 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, is locked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(iphone, be locked to carriers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is locked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is locked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, is locked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(iphone, be locked to carriers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(iphone, be locked to carriers)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is locked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(iphone, is locked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(iphone, is locked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(iphone, is locked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be locked to carriers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(iphone, be locked to carriers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell phone, is locked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(iphone, be locked to carriers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell phone, is locked)