ipod: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.68
, invention
Weight: 0.67
, format
Weight: 0.65
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.66
, iphone
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, dvd
Weight: 0.35
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
get 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(iphone, get hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dvd, get)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(iphone, get hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iphone, get hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(smartphone, get hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get hot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dvd, get)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dvd, get)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ipod, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ipod, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dvd, get)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(smartphone, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iphone, get hot)