:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(iphone, get hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dvd, get)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dvd, get)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dvd, get)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ipod, get hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ipod, get hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dvd, get)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(smartphone, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ipod, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iphone, get hot)