island: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents site
Weight: 0.65
, port
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.60
Siblings long island
Weight: 0.88
, rhode island
Weight: 0.85
, staten island
Weight: 0.84
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.81
, marshall islands
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be considered attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cayman islands, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(long island, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(long island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(long island, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cayman islands, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cayman islands, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(island, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(island, be considered attractive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(island, be considered attractive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(island, be considered attractive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(island, be considered attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(island, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(island, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(long island, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(island, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cayman islands, is expensive)