isotropy: does

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents assumption
Weight: 0.35
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
does 1.00
does come to london 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(expectation, does come to london)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(expectation, does come to london)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(expectation, does come to london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(isotropy, does)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(isotropy, does)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(isotropy, does)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(isotropy, does)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(expectation, does come to london)