ivy: be bad for trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.57
, evergreen
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, climber
Weight: 0.51
Siblings moss
Weight: 0.34
, horsetail
Weight: 0.33
, petunia
Weight: 0.33
, holly
Weight: 0.33
, apple tree
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for trees 1.00
survive on trees 0.89
grow on trees 0.89
grow up trees 0.88
cling to trees 0.81
climbing to bark tree 0.79
cling to bark of tree 0.79
grow on one side of tree trunk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moss, grow on trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(moss, grow on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(moss, grow on trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ivy, be bad for trees)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ivy, grow on trees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ivy, grow on trees)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ivy, grow on trees)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ivy, grow up trees)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ivy, grow up trees)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ivy, be bad for trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ivy, be bad for trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ivy, be bad for trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(moss, grow on trees)