jackal: have reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, scavenger
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, beast
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, fox
Weight: 0.36
, hyena
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have reputation 1.00
have bad reputation 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hyena, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hyena, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hyena, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(jackal, have reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jackal, have bad reputation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(jackal, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jackal, have reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hyena, have bad reputation)