jackal: look like person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, scavenger
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, beast
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, fox
Weight: 0.36
, hyena
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
look like person 1.00
look like person with fur 0.86
look like person with green fur 0.84
do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(scavenger, do)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jackal, look like person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scavenger, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(scavenger, do)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(jackal, look like person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(jackal, look like person)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(jackal, look like person with fur)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(jackal, look like person with green fur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(jackal, look like person with green fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(jackal, look like person with fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(jackal, look like person with fur)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jackal, look like person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jackal, look like person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(scavenger, do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(jackal, look like person)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(scavenger, do)