jackson: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.64
, democrat
Weight: 0.62
, celebrity
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.60
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.75
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.36
, jesse james
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
was bad 0.92
was great 0.90
was cancelled 0.84
has quality good 0.84
was weak 0.78
is kanima 0.76
was seen by some 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jackson, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(celebrity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jackson, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(celebrity, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(jackson, was good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(celebrity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(jackson, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jackson, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(jackson, was bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(jackson, was cancelled)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(jackson, was cancelled)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was cancelled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(jackson, was cancelled)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(jackson, was bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jackson, was bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(jackson, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(jackson, is kanima)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(jackson, is kanima)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(jackson, is kanima)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(jackson, was seen by some)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(jackson, was seen by some)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(jackson, was seen by some)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(jackson, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jackson, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(jackson, is kanima)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was seen by some)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jackson, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(jackson, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)