jackson: were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.64
, democrat
Weight: 0.62
, celebrity
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.60
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.75
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.36
, jesse james
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet 1.00
were advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet 1.00
were personal advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet 0.98
were personal advisors referred as kitchen cabinet 0.98
were advisors referred to 0.86
were advisors referred 0.86
were personal advisors referred to 0.85
were personal advisors referred 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(jackson, were personal advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were personal advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(jackson, were personal advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were personal advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(jackson, were personal advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(jackson, were personal advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(jackson, were personal advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(jackson, were personal advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(jackson, were advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(jackson, were advisors referred to as kitchen cabinet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred to)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(jackson, were personal advisors referred to)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(jackson, were personal advisors referred)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(jackson, were advisors referred to)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(jackson, were personal advisors referred to)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(jackson, were advisors referred)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(jackson, were personal advisors referred)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were personal advisors referred)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were personal advisors referred to)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred to)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jackson, were personal advisors referred to)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(jackson, were personal advisors referred)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(jackson, were advisors referred to)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(jackson, were advisors referred)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(jackson, were advisors referred as kitchen cabinet)