jade: be from mean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stone
Weight: 0.65
, mineral
Weight: 0.54
, color
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings emerald
Weight: 0.36
, sapphire
Weight: 0.36
, peridot
Weight: 0.35
, turquoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from mean 1.00
mean 0.95
be from victorious mean 0.76
be from mean to tori 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sapphire, mean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sapphire, mean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sapphire, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(jade, be from mean)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(jade, mean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(jade, be from victorious mean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(jade, mean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(jade, be from mean to tori)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(jade, be from mean to tori)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(jade, be from victorious mean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(jade, be from victorious mean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(jade, be from mean to tori)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(jade, mean)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(jade, be from mean to tori)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(jade, mean)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jade, be from victorious mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jade, be from mean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(jade, be from mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jade, be from mean)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sapphire, mean)