jail: be with parole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.65
, facility
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.58
, sanction
Weight: 0.57
Siblings prison
Weight: 0.37
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.37
, sentence
Weight: 0.35
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with parole 1.00
is sentence 0.80
be used in sentence 0.79
be in prison break 0.78
be called jail 0.77
be better than life imprisonment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(jail, be with parole)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, be better than life imprisonment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sentence, is sentence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sentence, be used in sentence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(jail, be with parole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sentence, is sentence)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sentence, is sentence)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sentence, be used in sentence)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sentence, be used in sentence)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capital punishment, be better than life imprisonment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, be better than life imprisonment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(jail, be with parole)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(jail, be called jail)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(jail, be called jail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(jail, be called jail)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(jail, be called jail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(jail, be with parole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sentence, is sentence)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sentence, be used in sentence)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capital punishment, be better than life imprisonment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(jail, be with parole)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(punishment, be better than life imprisonment)