jake: were in game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.56
, friend
Weight: 0.55
, band
Weight: 0.55
, kid
Weight: 0.53
, show
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tom
Weight: 0.34
, jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in game 1.00
were in westing game 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(jake, were in game)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(jake, were in westing game)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(jake, were in westing game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(jake, were in westing game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(jake, were in westing game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(jake, were in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(jake, were in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(jake, were in game)