jam: be better than jelly joke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accompaniment
Weight: 0.61
, sweet
Weight: 0.60
, recipe
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.31
, rock candy
Weight: 0.31
, macaroni
Weight: 0.31
, caramel
Weight: 0.31
, pickle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than jelly joke 1.00
be better than joke 0.90
is jelly and jell-o 0.88
is and jelly jell-o 0.88
is jelly 0.88
is jelly and jelly jell-o 0.87
is jamaica joke 0.81
be called jelly in usa 0.80
be better than chocolate 0.80
be potatoes better than regular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sweet, be better than chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sweet, be potatoes better than regular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sweet, be potatoes better than regular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sweet, be better than chocolate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sweet, be potatoes better than regular)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sweet, be better than chocolate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(macaroni, is jamaica joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sweet, be better than chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sweet, be potatoes better than regular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(macaroni, is jamaica joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(macaroni, is jamaica joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(jam, is jelly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(jam, is jelly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(jam, is jelly)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jam, be better than joke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(jam, is and jelly jell-o)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(jam, is and jelly jell-o)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(jam, is jelly and jell-o)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(jam, is jelly and jell-o)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(jam, is and jelly jell-o)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(jam, be better than joke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(jam, is jelly and jelly jell-o)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(jam, is jelly and jell-o)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(jam, be better than joke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(jam, be called jelly in usa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(jam, be called jelly in usa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(jam, is jelly and jelly jell-o)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jam, is jelly and jelly jell-o)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(jam, be called jelly in usa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(jam, is jelly and jelly jell-o)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(jam, is jelly and jell-o)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(jam, is and jelly jell-o)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(jam, is jelly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(jam, be called jelly in usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sweet, be potatoes better than regular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sweet, be better than chocolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(macaroni, is jamaica joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sweet, be better than chocolate)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(jam, be better than jelly joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sweet, be potatoes better than regular)