james watt: was known

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents inventor
Weight: 0.64
, scientist
Weight: 0.57
, figure
Weight: 0.55
, scot
Weight: 0.55
, engineer
Weight: 0.54
Siblings james watson
Weight: 0.34
, isaac newton
Weight: 0.33
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was known 1.00
was known for 0.98
was regarded as real inventor 0.79
was regarded as inventor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(james watt, was known)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(james watt, was known for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(james watt, was known for)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(james watt, was regarded as real inventor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(james watt, was regarded as inventor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(james watt, was known for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(james watt, was known for)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(james watt, was regarded as real inventor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(james watt, was regarded as inventor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(james watt, was regarded as real inventor)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(james watt, was regarded as inventor)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(james watt, was regarded as inventor)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(james watt, was regarded as real inventor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(james watt, was known)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(james watt, was known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(james watt, was known)