japan: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents europe
Weight: 0.72
, south america
Weight: 0.68
, north america
Weight: 0.66
, asia
Weight: 0.65
, latin america
Weight: 0.64
Siblings south korea
Weight: 0.72
, indonesia
Weight: 0.68
, germany
Weight: 0.66
, britain
Weight: 0.63
, italy
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ageing population 1.00
have population 1.00
has population 0.99
have large population 0.94
have larger population 0.92
have population growth 0.92
have rapidly ageing population 0.91
has population decrease 0.90
have population density 0.89
compare in population 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(asia, have large population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(japan, have population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(europe, have population density)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(japan, have population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(asia, have large population)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(europe, have population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(asia, have large population)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(europe, have population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(south korea, have population density)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, have population)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(italy, has population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(asia, have large population)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(japan, have population)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(europe, have population density)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(japan, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(indonesia, have population)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(indonesia, have population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(italy, has population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(italy, has population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(south korea, have population density)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(south korea, have population density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(japan, have population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(japan, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(europe, have population density)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(asia, have large population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(italy, has population)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(indonesia, have population)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(south korea, have population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(asia, have large population)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(japan, have population)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(europe, have population density)