java: be better than javascript

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coffee
Weight: 0.72
, software
Weight: 0.59
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, island
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings groovy
Weight: 0.50
, tcl
Weight: 0.46
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.37
, mocha
Weight: 0.36
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than javascript 1.00
be in javascript 0.97
be different from javascript 0.97
be related to javascript 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(java, be better than javascript)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(java, be in javascript)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(java, be in javascript)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(java, be in javascript)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(java, be in javascript)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(java, be different from javascript)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(java, be different from javascript)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(java, be related to javascript)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(java, be different from javascript)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(java, be different from javascript)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(java, be related to javascript)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(java, be related to javascript)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(java, be related to javascript)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(java, be better than javascript)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(java, be better than javascript) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(java, be better than javascript)