javascript: is future programming language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.67
, programming language
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, source code
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
Siblings css
Weight: 0.60
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, google
Weight: 0.35
, php
Weight: 0.35
, perl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is future programming language 1.00
is programming language 0.95
is popular programming language 0.93
be known as object-based programming language 0.92
be known as programming language 0.92
is most popular programming language 0.92
is language 0.85
be called language 0.82
be considered loosely-typed language 0.82
be considered language 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(php, be called language)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(php, be considered language)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(php, is language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(php, is language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(php, is language)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(php, be called language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(php, be called language)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(php, be considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(php, be considered language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(javascript, is future programming language)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(javascript, be known as object-based programming language)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(javascript, be known as object-based programming language)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is most popular programming language)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(javascript, is language)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(javascript, be considered loosely-typed language)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(javascript, be known as object-based programming language)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(javascript, be known as object-based programming language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(javascript, be considered loosely-typed language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(javascript, is language)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(javascript, is language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(javascript, be considered loosely-typed language)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(javascript, be considered loosely-typed language)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(javascript, is most popular programming language)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(javascript, is most popular programming language)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(javascript, is most popular programming language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(javascript, is future programming language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(php, is language)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(php, be called language)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(javascript, is future programming language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(php, be considered language)