javascript: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.67
, programming language
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, source code
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
Siblings css
Weight: 0.60
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, google
Weight: 0.35
, php
Weight: 0.35
, perl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was invented 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(css, was developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(google, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(css, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(css, was developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(google, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(google, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(javascript, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(javascript, was invented)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(javascript, was invented)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(javascript, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(javascript, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(css, was developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(javascript, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(google, was invented)