jeans: wear out in crotch

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, attire
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shirt
Weight: 0.60
, dress
Weight: 0.37
, blouse
Weight: 0.36
, underwear
Weight: 0.35
, denim
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear out in crotch 1.00
rip in crotch 0.92
tear at crotch 0.91
wear out in spot 0.76
be standard for men 's underwear 0.75
wear out in same spot 0.75
be with insanely deep cleavage work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dress, be with insanely deep cleavage work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(underwear, wear out in spot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(underwear, be standard for men 's underwear)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(underwear, wear out in same spot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(underwear, wear out in spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(underwear, wear out in spot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dress, be with insanely deep cleavage work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dress, be with insanely deep cleavage work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(underwear, wear out in same spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(underwear, wear out in same spot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(underwear, be standard for men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(underwear, be standard for men 's underwear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(jeans, wear out in crotch)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(jeans, rip in crotch)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(jeans, rip in crotch)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(jeans, rip in crotch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(jeans, tear at crotch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(jeans, tear at crotch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, tear at crotch)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(jeans, rip in crotch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(jeans, tear at crotch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(jeans, wear out in crotch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dress, be with insanely deep cleavage work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(underwear, wear out in spot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(underwear, wear out in same spot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(jeans, wear out in crotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(underwear, be standard for men 's underwear)