jeep: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.71
, vehicle
Weight: 0.65
, road
Weight: 0.65
, driver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.37
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.37
, van
Weight: 0.36
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jeep, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(jeep, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jeep, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jeep, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(jeep, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jeep, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(jeep, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jeep, have bad reputation)