:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(van, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(van, is expensive)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(van, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(van, is cheap)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(jeep, is cheap)
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(jeep, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is expensive)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(jeep, is cheap)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(van, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(van, is expensive)