jelly: taste together good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sauce
Weight: 0.62
, flavor
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, mayonnaise
Weight: 0.36
, caramel
Weight: 0.35
, tartar sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste together good 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jelly, taste together good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(caramel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tartar sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jelly, taste together good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(tartar sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tartar sauce, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(caramel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(caramel, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mayonnaise, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(jelly, taste together good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jelly, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(jelly, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(jelly, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(jelly, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jelly, taste together good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tartar sauce, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(caramel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jelly, taste together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)