jem: be like mockingbird

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents series
Weight: 0.43
, character
Weight: 0.42
, guitar
Weight: 0.41
, show
Weight: 0.41
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.30
, billy
Weight: 0.30
, ibanez
Weight: 0.30
, medusa
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like mockingbird 1.00
be considered mockingbird 0.97
kill mockingbird 0.96
was finch 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(jem, be like mockingbird)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(jem, kill mockingbird)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(jem, be considered mockingbird)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(jem, kill mockingbird)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(jem, kill mockingbird)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(jem, be considered mockingbird)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(jem, be considered mockingbird)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jem, be considered mockingbird)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(jem, was finch)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(jem, kill mockingbird)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(jem, was finch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(jem, was finch)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jem, was finch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(jem, be like mockingbird)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(jem, be like mockingbird)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(jem, be like mockingbird)