jet: be more efficient at high altitude

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, airplane
Weight: 0.57
, craft
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.54
Siblings plane ticket
Weight: 0.34
, jet plane
Weight: 0.34
, aircraft
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient at high altitude 1.00
be more efficient at altitude 0.99
burn fuel at altitude 0.87
stall at high altitude 0.86
fly at higher altitudes 0.85
fly at 9000 meters altitude 0.84
fly at altitudes 0.84
stall at altitude 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jet plane, fly at altitudes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jet plane, fly at altitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(jet plane, fly at altitudes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(jet, fly at 9000 meters altitude)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(jet, stall at high altitude)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(jet, fly at 9000 meters altitude)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(jet, stall at high altitude)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(jet, burn fuel at altitude)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(jet, fly at 9000 meters altitude)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(jet, burn fuel at altitude)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(jet, stall at high altitude)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(jet, burn fuel at altitude)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(jet, fly at 9000 meters altitude)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jet, burn fuel at altitude)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(jet, fly at higher altitudes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(jet, stall at high altitude)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(jet, fly at higher altitudes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(jet, fly at higher altitudes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jet, fly at higher altitudes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(jet, be more efficient at high altitude)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jet, be more efficient at high altitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(jet plane, fly at altitudes)